As an advocate of Freedom, I've personally come up with a number of goals to work toward.
My first is to do what we can to wholly terminate the use of the Covid 19 'vaccine' products and particularly the modified mRNA platform (wide use is antipated) until such time as data and studies prove they are safe and effective. I do not expect that will be established.
My second is to do what ever we can to prevent any "One World Governance."
I do have more, but these are the most pressing from my perspective.
I do go around supporting beneficial efforts and receive little pushback.
I do all I can to support what one might describe as fellow freedom fighters.
I am aware of the evils they have and are experiencing. I find it deplorable and counter to devoting all needed efforts on achieving Freedom objectives.
On that basis I judge people representing themselves as "Freedom Fighters" based on what they are accomplishing and demonstrating they are working to accomplish as relates to the overarching goals. I judge each of us and myself on that basis alone. Backbiting, demeaning, preening, bad jacketing, et al - have no role IMO in pursuing the objectives. They obstruct positive progress. They waste everyone's time.
Certainly the perpetrators of disruption are likely to be psychopaths.and egotistical. Both of our measures can be said to apply.
Regarding Vitamin D toxicity I did meet a patient one night who had increased his vitamin D dose to 20,000 IU twice a day on his own. His 40000 units daily drove his calcium high enough that his kidneys shut down. I can’t recall what brought him to the ER but I was called to admit him due to his new onset renal failure and hypercalcemia. It is easy enough with Direct Lab Services (direct labs.com) to get a vitamin D level and know where you stand.
According to this study by Veith - courtesy of Dr. Paul Marik - toxicity begins above a level of 240 ng/ml which is extremely difficult to achieve without massively higher doses than 50,000 units per day - much greater than 10,000 units per day. The takeaway message? Fear low levels of Vitamin D which are associated with increased death from all causes. Most of us are D deficient and according to Dr. Marik - even without measured levels, it is safe to take 10,000 units per day. At 10,000 units of Vitamin D per day - according to Dr. Marik - there is no risk of toxicity.
#1. 10,000 units a day is safe regardless of testing levels.
#2. The chances of a patient dying from cancer, immune compromise, heart disease i.e., all causes is massively greater than the chances of ever contracting Vitamin D toxicity even from greater than 20,000 units per day.
"The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration that is the threshold for vitamin D toxicity has not been established. Hypercalcemia is the hazard criterion for vitamin D. Past policy of the Institute of Medicine has set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D at 50 mug (2000 IU)/d, defining this as "the highest level of daily nutrient intake that is likely to pose no risks of adverse health effects to almost all individuals in the general population." However, because sunshine can provide an adult with vitamin D in an amount equivalent to daily oral consumption of 250 mug (10,000 IU)/d, this is intuitively a safe dose. The incremental consumption of 1 mug (40 IU)/day of vitamin D(3) raises serum 25(OH)D by approximately 1 nM (0.4 ng/ml). Therefore, if sun-deprived adults are to maintain serum 25(OH)D concentrations >75 nM (30 ng/ml), they will require an intake of more than the UL for vitamin D. The mechanisms that limit vitamin D safety are the capacity of circulating vitamin D-binding protein and the ability to suppress 25(OH)D-1-alpha-hydroxylase. Vitamin D causes hypercalcemia when the "free" concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is inappropriately high. This displacement of 1,25(OH)(2)D becomes excessive as plasma 25(OH)D concentrations become higher than at least 600 nM (240 ng/ml). Plasma concentrations of unmetabolized vitamin D during the first days after an acute, large dose of vitamin D can reach the micromolar range and cause acute symptoms. The clinical trial evidence shows that a prolonged intake of 250 mug (10,000 IU)/d of vitamin D(3) is likely to pose no risk of adverse effects in almost all individuals in the general population; this meets the criteria for a tolerable upper intake level."
I agree 10,000 IU's is completely safe, with their being absolutely no danger of toxicity. But I recently found studies that are not new,... that suggest there is a U-shaped curve regarding all cause mortality and D3 blood levels. And there was a few of them. Naturally I thought these were bought and paid for, but I didn't see any conflicts, and the studies all had large sample sizes, all showing the same thing from different authors and different locations. It suggests high blood levels (60 ng/ml and above) is not as healthy as we thought. Of course they all say causality cannot be inferred, but still....
I really would like some kind of explanation for this. It seems counterintuitive. There must have been a conversation on this, being these studies are not new. The latest one is 2012.
If those by the equator, have blood levels beyond 50 ng/ml how is this not optimal? These studies suggest the sweet spot in the U-curve is 25-35 ng/ml. I can't believe that would be optimal.
Absolutely! Unless you have severe deficiency, no need to take astronomical amounts. Use some common sense people. The guy who died with a reading of 380. Did he never have a blood test done? 🤦♀️
About vitamin D which is really a hormone. For the last 7-8 months, I have been popping 8,000 IU (one pill) of vit D religiously everyday. Or so I thought. Then last week, I discovered that my pill was really 8,000 units of vit A. I don't know if I ordered the wrong thing or if they sent me the wrong thing.
Maybe getting older really does wreck your attention span.
Anyway, my vit D has mainly come from sunshine which being in a northern clime is a hit or miss proposition. I don't believe the chemical D in a bottle is anything close to getting actual sunshine. Most D I have ever seen is made from cholecalciferol which is a not too healthy chemical according to the MSDS info. Plus they seem to add in a bunch of other gunk that doesn't sound to good.
I haven't been getting the D I thought I was and yet I am not sick and haven't been sick. I have been getting off the supplement kick after checking on some of the ingredients. I will stick to herbal tinctures for the most part. My trust factor for many things is in the dumpster.
No need to lack trust in the right people. For example, watch Dr. David Grimes discuss why you need to raise your Vitamin D level. He is trustworthy as is Dr. John Campbell. Those who would have you fear Vitamin D are not.
Random question: are nano lipid versions of vitamins as dangerous as nanolipids used for mRNA materials? Will my nanocurcumin go into organs and brain. Apologies for my very non scientific and possibility ridiculous question. Thank you doctor!!
In defense of psychopaths, I believe that it's a fairly neutral trait that manifests severely at both ends of the bell curve. On the evil end you get the Davos crowd, at the good end you get the best doctors priests and local butchers. The metaphor that best fits is that if empaths/normies are like sheep, psychopaths are like canines. You can have wolves that hunt sheep or sheepdogs who herd and protect them from wolves.
In short, empaths will never ever be able to root out psychopaths. Even in this very comment section you can see that empaths are hopelessly outmatched and lacking in understanding of what they are up against. You need psychopaths who are society's sheepdogs to do it - and much like the analogy if you have that guardian the roving wolves would rather not fight and move on to easier prey. You can see it in places like North Korea - globohomo would rather back down and move onto easier unguarded prey in South Korea.
The question becomes; what happened to the psychopaths who would fight evil psychopaths? I believe, much like the murder of legitimate doctors in the era of witchburnings, good psychopaths are the first and oftentimes the only ones to be purged when empaths try to turn against psychopaths. The good psychopaths are selected against and only the most deceitful psychopaths remain, as opposed to carving out an intended niche for them. Instead of having an official position of "Judge Dredd" who we know is a weirdo but still arrests and kills the corrupt, we drive them to the outskirts of society and are helpless when a charasmatic sociopath moves in.
I loved your work at The Desert Review. Learned a lot, especially what went down in India. And recently, learned of the benefits of fenbendazole and mebendazole for cancer. And I would have been shocked by this, had I not done extensive research on the other anti-parasitic, Ivermectin. It's amazing a whole slew of anti-parasitic meds have shown benefits for cancer. There are more in this class including Parbendazol and Oxibendazole.
Being a colon cancer survivor (stage 2b) for over ten years, it good to know I have more options. Been taking many nutrients in that time with anti-cancer properties, ie.. selenium, D3, K2, etc... Also LDN,... and now with Ivermectin prophylactically for the last year or so, I feel confident I will remain cancer free.
These are difficult times. Cause not only is it imperative we look at the scientific literature for ourselves,... but having to weed through the bought and paid for studies, that have exploded exponentially of late, is not that easy. But what choice do we have? How can we ever trust the CDC or the FDA again?
Weeding through the bought and paid-for studies in the scientific literature is daunting. Especially when dealing with black propaganda and black propagandists. However, identifying sociopaths is orders of magnitude easier. Look for whether or not the authors repeatedly show empathy in their work. If they do not, think Tony Fauci and Andrew Hill, or if they require massive payments like Fauci and Hill, suspect they are dealing in black propaganda. Paul Marik, Tess Lawrie, George Fareed, and Peter McCullough do not meet these criteria. They much more meet the criteria of being empaths - they show repeated acts of kindness and tend to shun large money paydays. So, I like to perform a multifactorial analysis and factor in whether the source is a sociopath or an empath.
The scientific journals are so captured by Big Pharma it's crazy. For honest researchers to get their work published these days, they have to compromise their integrity. It's truly sad. They have to carefully word their conclusions as to not rock the agenda, otherwise their discovery will never be published, and therefore never be taken seriously.
I have found Dr. Marik’s books regarding prevention and treatment of cancer extremely valuable. I have a lot of cancer in my family and have come to believe these books should be read by as many people as possible. His explanations are well written and understandable; giving deeper dive into the mechanisms of cancer. Since you are a cancer survivor, I would highly recommend!
And Dr. Marik happens to be the antithesis of a sociopath. He shows repeated acts of kindness and shuns money to help people. You will not find that in some of the imposters who inhabit our freedom movement. And they starkly stand out in contrast.
Thank you Elizabeth. If you read through my substack newsletters, you will see I quote his work, the FLCCC and Dr. Kory. I knew much of the anti-cancer alternatives long before the FLCCC came to be,.. other than the anti-parasitic meds. Cancer is mostly a metabolic disorder. Your immunity drops off a cliff, when you turn 70, which is when cancer is most prevalent. We fight cancer everyday, until we are no longer able. Just FYI.
I'm divided between exposing the sociopaths and the thinking that they're just patsies, which is cruelty, too, or that they're inadvertently involved. I pray they can regard the lives and truth they freely plunder with some semblance of empathy.
And a great book for those in a position to attempt to halt the growth of a young (child) budding sociopath read "Before It's Too Late" by Stanton E. Samenow.
What if we lived in a world where empathy and emotions were a disadvantage?
What if we lived in a world where only the most evil psychopaths made it to the top?
What if we lived in a world where all the politicians were corrupt?
What if the psychopaths owned all the newspapers and television stations?
What if the psychopaths run the Federal Reserve and all the worlds central banks?
What if the psychopaths took over the UN, NATO, the WHO and the CIA?
What if the psychopaths run the military industrial complex?
What if the psychopaths took over the biological weapons industry?
What if the psychopaths had diplomatic immunity from prosecution by any court in the world?
What if the psychopaths decide there are too many poor people in the world?
You would have the biggest and most deadly terrorist organisation in the world.
Sounds like what we have!
Wow!! Great response! And you are unfortunately right. The good guys don’t want the power for power’s sake.
Psychopath supporting newspaper companies, TV stations, medical journals, and medical schools = Bill Gates
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants BillGates Grant Link
It's terrifying if you look at it carefully.
Newspeak. Bribery and corruption is now called philanthropy!
As you said, I remember when Gates stopped being the president of Microsoft and said, ``I'm going to do some philanthropic work to help humanity.''
I learned that from 2021 onwards, philanthropy ≠ philanthropy.
What an amazing article! Love your clarity!
As an advocate of Freedom, I've personally come up with a number of goals to work toward.
My first is to do what we can to wholly terminate the use of the Covid 19 'vaccine' products and particularly the modified mRNA platform (wide use is antipated) until such time as data and studies prove they are safe and effective. I do not expect that will be established.
My second is to do what ever we can to prevent any "One World Governance."
I do have more, but these are the most pressing from my perspective.
I do go around supporting beneficial efforts and receive little pushback.
I do all I can to support what one might describe as fellow freedom fighters.
I am aware of the evils they have and are experiencing. I find it deplorable and counter to devoting all needed efforts on achieving Freedom objectives.
On that basis I judge people representing themselves as "Freedom Fighters" based on what they are accomplishing and demonstrating they are working to accomplish as relates to the overarching goals. I judge each of us and myself on that basis alone. Backbiting, demeaning, preening, bad jacketing, et al - have no role IMO in pursuing the objectives. They obstruct positive progress. They waste everyone's time.
Certainly the perpetrators of disruption are likely to be psychopaths.and egotistical. Both of our measures can be said to apply.
Regarding Vitamin D toxicity I did meet a patient one night who had increased his vitamin D dose to 20,000 IU twice a day on his own. His 40000 units daily drove his calcium high enough that his kidneys shut down. I can’t recall what brought him to the ER but I was called to admit him due to his new onset renal failure and hypercalcemia. It is easy enough with Direct Lab Services (direct labs.com) to get a vitamin D level and know where you stand.
According to this study by Veith - courtesy of Dr. Paul Marik - toxicity begins above a level of 240 ng/ml which is extremely difficult to achieve without massively higher doses than 50,000 units per day - much greater than 10,000 units per day. The takeaway message? Fear low levels of Vitamin D which are associated with increased death from all causes. Most of us are D deficient and according to Dr. Marik - even without measured levels, it is safe to take 10,000 units per day. At 10,000 units of Vitamin D per day - according to Dr. Marik - there is no risk of toxicity.
#1. 10,000 units a day is safe regardless of testing levels.
#2. The chances of a patient dying from cancer, immune compromise, heart disease i.e., all causes is massively greater than the chances of ever contracting Vitamin D toxicity even from greater than 20,000 units per day.
"The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration that is the threshold for vitamin D toxicity has not been established. Hypercalcemia is the hazard criterion for vitamin D. Past policy of the Institute of Medicine has set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D at 50 mug (2000 IU)/d, defining this as "the highest level of daily nutrient intake that is likely to pose no risks of adverse health effects to almost all individuals in the general population." However, because sunshine can provide an adult with vitamin D in an amount equivalent to daily oral consumption of 250 mug (10,000 IU)/d, this is intuitively a safe dose. The incremental consumption of 1 mug (40 IU)/day of vitamin D(3) raises serum 25(OH)D by approximately 1 nM (0.4 ng/ml). Therefore, if sun-deprived adults are to maintain serum 25(OH)D concentrations >75 nM (30 ng/ml), they will require an intake of more than the UL for vitamin D. The mechanisms that limit vitamin D safety are the capacity of circulating vitamin D-binding protein and the ability to suppress 25(OH)D-1-alpha-hydroxylase. Vitamin D causes hypercalcemia when the "free" concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is inappropriately high. This displacement of 1,25(OH)(2)D becomes excessive as plasma 25(OH)D concentrations become higher than at least 600 nM (240 ng/ml). Plasma concentrations of unmetabolized vitamin D during the first days after an acute, large dose of vitamin D can reach the micromolar range and cause acute symptoms. The clinical trial evidence shows that a prolonged intake of 250 mug (10,000 IU)/d of vitamin D(3) is likely to pose no risk of adverse effects in almost all individuals in the general population; this meets the criteria for a tolerable upper intake level."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18290725/
I agree 10,000 IU's is completely safe, with their being absolutely no danger of toxicity. But I recently found studies that are not new,... that suggest there is a U-shaped curve regarding all cause mortality and D3 blood levels. And there was a few of them. Naturally I thought these were bought and paid for, but I didn't see any conflicts, and the studies all had large sample sizes, all showing the same thing from different authors and different locations. It suggests high blood levels (60 ng/ml and above) is not as healthy as we thought. Of course they all say causality cannot be inferred, but still....
I really would like some kind of explanation for this. It seems counterintuitive. There must have been a conversation on this, being these studies are not new. The latest one is 2012.
If those by the equator, have blood levels beyond 50 ng/ml how is this not optimal? These studies suggest the sweet spot in the U-curve is 25-35 ng/ml. I can't believe that would be optimal.
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/what-you-thought-you-knew-of-d3-hardly
Could it be,.. that those with high D3 blood levels, didn't have enough K2? Cause there's an insufficiency of this in the population as well.
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/incredible-benefits-of-k2-the-forgotten
Absolutely! Unless you have severe deficiency, no need to take astronomical amounts. Use some common sense people. The guy who died with a reading of 380. Did he never have a blood test done? 🤦♀️
About vitamin D which is really a hormone. For the last 7-8 months, I have been popping 8,000 IU (one pill) of vit D religiously everyday. Or so I thought. Then last week, I discovered that my pill was really 8,000 units of vit A. I don't know if I ordered the wrong thing or if they sent me the wrong thing.
Maybe getting older really does wreck your attention span.
Anyway, my vit D has mainly come from sunshine which being in a northern clime is a hit or miss proposition. I don't believe the chemical D in a bottle is anything close to getting actual sunshine. Most D I have ever seen is made from cholecalciferol which is a not too healthy chemical according to the MSDS info. Plus they seem to add in a bunch of other gunk that doesn't sound to good.
I haven't been getting the D I thought I was and yet I am not sick and haven't been sick. I have been getting off the supplement kick after checking on some of the ingredients. I will stick to herbal tinctures for the most part. My trust factor for many things is in the dumpster.
No need to lack trust in the right people. For example, watch Dr. David Grimes discuss why you need to raise your Vitamin D level. He is trustworthy as is Dr. John Campbell. Those who would have you fear Vitamin D are not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hO7fniCbmw
Be careful supplementing with vitamin A.
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/about-the-new-outbreak-in-china
Here's a cheap quality brand of D3, with no crap in it....
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GB85JR4/ref=ox_sc_saved_title_9?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1
You just need to shop a little better. There's no other way to get proper D3 blood levels, unless you eat fish 3x a day. Or fish oil.
Cholecalciferol is the chemical that's made in your skin following UVB exposure. And so why is it "not too healthy"?
Random question: are nano lipid versions of vitamins as dangerous as nanolipids used for mRNA materials? Will my nanocurcumin go into organs and brain. Apologies for my very non scientific and possibility ridiculous question. Thank you doctor!!
Wow good question. I would be very hesitant, after what we know about the vaccine's LNPs.
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/biontechpfizer-and-the-ema-knew-the
In defense of psychopaths, I believe that it's a fairly neutral trait that manifests severely at both ends of the bell curve. On the evil end you get the Davos crowd, at the good end you get the best doctors priests and local butchers. The metaphor that best fits is that if empaths/normies are like sheep, psychopaths are like canines. You can have wolves that hunt sheep or sheepdogs who herd and protect them from wolves.
In short, empaths will never ever be able to root out psychopaths. Even in this very comment section you can see that empaths are hopelessly outmatched and lacking in understanding of what they are up against. You need psychopaths who are society's sheepdogs to do it - and much like the analogy if you have that guardian the roving wolves would rather not fight and move on to easier prey. You can see it in places like North Korea - globohomo would rather back down and move onto easier unguarded prey in South Korea.
The question becomes; what happened to the psychopaths who would fight evil psychopaths? I believe, much like the murder of legitimate doctors in the era of witchburnings, good psychopaths are the first and oftentimes the only ones to be purged when empaths try to turn against psychopaths. The good psychopaths are selected against and only the most deceitful psychopaths remain, as opposed to carving out an intended niche for them. Instead of having an official position of "Judge Dredd" who we know is a weirdo but still arrests and kills the corrupt, we drive them to the outskirts of society and are helpless when a charasmatic sociopath moves in.
I loved your work at The Desert Review. Learned a lot, especially what went down in India. And recently, learned of the benefits of fenbendazole and mebendazole for cancer. And I would have been shocked by this, had I not done extensive research on the other anti-parasitic, Ivermectin. It's amazing a whole slew of anti-parasitic meds have shown benefits for cancer. There are more in this class including Parbendazol and Oxibendazole.
Being a colon cancer survivor (stage 2b) for over ten years, it good to know I have more options. Been taking many nutrients in that time with anti-cancer properties, ie.. selenium, D3, K2, etc... Also LDN,... and now with Ivermectin prophylactically for the last year or so, I feel confident I will remain cancer free.
These are difficult times. Cause not only is it imperative we look at the scientific literature for ourselves,... but having to weed through the bought and paid for studies, that have exploded exponentially of late, is not that easy. But what choice do we have? How can we ever trust the CDC or the FDA again?
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/why-everyone-should-have-ivermectin
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/ivermectins-us-demise-the-together
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/war-on-freedom-has-begun-with-draconian
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/improve-your-immune-function-with
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/cancer-and-boosters
Weeding through the bought and paid-for studies in the scientific literature is daunting. Especially when dealing with black propaganda and black propagandists. However, identifying sociopaths is orders of magnitude easier. Look for whether or not the authors repeatedly show empathy in their work. If they do not, think Tony Fauci and Andrew Hill, or if they require massive payments like Fauci and Hill, suspect they are dealing in black propaganda. Paul Marik, Tess Lawrie, George Fareed, and Peter McCullough do not meet these criteria. They much more meet the criteria of being empaths - they show repeated acts of kindness and tend to shun large money paydays. So, I like to perform a multifactorial analysis and factor in whether the source is a sociopath or an empath.
The scientific journals are so captured by Big Pharma it's crazy. For honest researchers to get their work published these days, they have to compromise their integrity. It's truly sad. They have to carefully word their conclusions as to not rock the agenda, otherwise their discovery will never be published, and therefore never be taken seriously.
Check out Dr. Kory in a very recent interview on exactly this topic.... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-korys-excellent-interview
I have found Dr. Marik’s books regarding prevention and treatment of cancer extremely valuable. I have a lot of cancer in my family and have come to believe these books should be read by as many people as possible. His explanations are well written and understandable; giving deeper dive into the mechanisms of cancer. Since you are a cancer survivor, I would highly recommend!
And Dr. Marik happens to be the antithesis of a sociopath. He shows repeated acts of kindness and shuns money to help people. You will not find that in some of the imposters who inhabit our freedom movement. And they starkly stand out in contrast.
Did you see him crying in that committee room? I cried along with him.
BTW I am recommending you on my substack page. Keep up the great work.
Thank you Elizabeth. If you read through my substack newsletters, you will see I quote his work, the FLCCC and Dr. Kory. I knew much of the anti-cancer alternatives long before the FLCCC came to be,.. other than the anti-parasitic meds. Cancer is mostly a metabolic disorder. Your immunity drops off a cliff, when you turn 70, which is when cancer is most prevalent. We fight cancer everyday, until we are no longer able. Just FYI.
Fabulous ! and, please, where can we find your Part 1 of this writing ?
https://open.substack.com/pub/justusrhope/p/telling-the-covid-good-guys-from?r=17wv6g&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Aha good - thanks muchly !
Idk. I am not anxious or depressed, am I a sociopath?
Be very careful building boxes.
https://youtu.be/gDq3HHExpnY?si=i5H0WUzfbg6qHwK0
I'm divided between exposing the sociopaths and the thinking that they're just patsies, which is cruelty, too, or that they're inadvertently involved. I pray they can regard the lives and truth they freely plunder with some semblance of empathy.
Feeling sorry for sociopaths is playing their game. They love the pity play, and that is how they succeed.
So where is part one?
https://open.substack.com/pub/justusrhope/p/telling-the-covid-good-guys-from?r=17wv6g&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
And a great book for those in a position to attempt to halt the growth of a young (child) budding sociopath read "Before It's Too Late" by Stanton E. Samenow.