Oh, I was certainly on to these frauds years ago when I read what they said about the most believed, most beloved scientist in the world, Dr. Michael Yeadon!
Dr. Michael Yeadon, a highly respected, former Senior VP at Pfizer is hard to discredit. And notice how Wikipedia relies on "Fact Checks" to challenge him.
I find this surprising as I've fact checked the integrity of Wiki with numerous government trusted independent fact checkers who have given Wiki a big green tick and confirmation that it's a trusted site. I also donate my hard earned cash to help keep this bastion of truth and font of all knowledge going.
The world would be a lot dimmer, without Wikipedia, I like that slogan, maybe I could sell it to the CIA, I mean Wikipedia.
oh what fun to read Justus - in spite of the actual meaning of the content, i mean. How fresh to see the wiki so publicly bared.
when i look up vocab words, wiki always tries to answer first, so i read the dictionary definitions first and then the wiki. So far, we are safe in this mundane venture. They still have a sense of what words in English should mean - but DON'T ask about medicine, as that's far too confusing for them...
Mebendazole is being trialled with docetaxel for PC by the University at Glasgow, Ivermectin has been added to Triple Negative Breast Cancer treatment by the City of Hope (AOH1996 Fame) Itraconazole is part of a 9 or 10 drug intervention for Glioblastoma (Dr. Marc-Eric Halatsch) Neuro oncologist iirc.
Dr. Marc-Eric Halatsch along with Dr. Richard Kast wrote a Foreword for my book - Surviving Cancer COVID-19 & Disease: The Repurposed Drug Revolution. Dr. Halatsch and Dr. Kast are the co-inventors of the CUSP9v3 Protocol for Glioblastoma. They also recently co-authored a paper published in the British Journal of Cancer highlighting the synergistic effects of Tumor Treating Electrical Fields in Glioblastoma.
Thank you for confirming my impressions. I had heard it was particularly poor as relates to information about persons and otherwise unreliable. O that basis I haven't sought it out .
Thank God someone is writing about Wikipedia and the disservice it is doing. At least 7 or 8 years ago I started questioning what I was reading on the site because it just didn’t jibe with what I knew to be true. It became overwhelmingly clear in 2020 when many excellent doctors and others were publicly humiliated by the rewrite of their Wikipedia pages with no recourse. I now avoid it because I know it is biased and just another propaganda tool. Unfortunately, something that was a great idea was bastardized and is no longer relevant.
You don't have to look much further than to know that the founder of Wikipedia is a huge donor to Joe "Potatoe Head Pedo" Bidens campaign! Always follow the money!
When Wikipedia was relatively new, I listened to a lecture about how it was a site, par excellence, by the founder. I actually spoke to him, as from a librarian point of view, we wanted students to not use Wikipedia. This person, high up in Wikipedia, said that doctors use Wikipedia all of the time as their main source of information about drugs and dosages and medical issues. I asked my young nephew, a doctor about this, and he agreed. I don’t think this is the case now, as there are more official databases for this, but I thought that it was pretty scary that people were being medically treated according to Wikipedia protocols.
Thank you for the good article. It was sometime around the 2016 election year I became aware the Wikipedia is most definitely NOT reliable when it comes political subjects. Add to that things that shouldn't be political but get politicized, like the topics in your article.
I still use Wikipedia for non controversial interests, like cars and music. I find it pretty reliable for those. I am somewhat torn because it is a useful resource for many things and there is no alternative I know of nearly as voluminous. So I just steer clear of anything controversial.
Oh, I was certainly on to these frauds years ago when I read what they said about the most believed, most beloved scientist in the world, Dr. Michael Yeadon!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Yeadon
Dr. Michael Yeadon, a highly respected, former Senior VP at Pfizer is hard to discredit. And notice how Wikipedia relies on "Fact Checks" to challenge him.
And I remember they used to beg for money once you log on to their page🙄
They’re not going anywhere because the cabal keeps them afloat.
Yes, and it seems they say lies about everyone that challenges their narrative!
I might use Wikipedia for birth and death dates of people but not much else.
Wikipedia was captured at some point and turned into an "under the radar" propaganda machine.
It was a great website back then when it started. Unfortunately all good things come to an end sooner or later.
I find this surprising as I've fact checked the integrity of Wiki with numerous government trusted independent fact checkers who have given Wiki a big green tick and confirmation that it's a trusted site. I also donate my hard earned cash to help keep this bastion of truth and font of all knowledge going.
The world would be a lot dimmer, without Wikipedia, I like that slogan, maybe I could sell it to the CIA, I mean Wikipedia.
oh what fun to read Justus - in spite of the actual meaning of the content, i mean. How fresh to see the wiki so publicly bared.
when i look up vocab words, wiki always tries to answer first, so i read the dictionary definitions first and then the wiki. So far, we are safe in this mundane venture. They still have a sense of what words in English should mean - but DON'T ask about medicine, as that's far too confusing for them...
Mebendazole is being trialled with docetaxel for PC by the University at Glasgow, Ivermectin has been added to Triple Negative Breast Cancer treatment by the City of Hope (AOH1996 Fame) Itraconazole is part of a 9 or 10 drug intervention for Glioblastoma (Dr. Marc-Eric Halatsch) Neuro oncologist iirc.
Dr. Marc-Eric Halatsch along with Dr. Richard Kast wrote a Foreword for my book - Surviving Cancer COVID-19 & Disease: The Repurposed Drug Revolution. Dr. Halatsch and Dr. Kast are the co-inventors of the CUSP9v3 Protocol for Glioblastoma. They also recently co-authored a paper published in the British Journal of Cancer highlighting the synergistic effects of Tumor Treating Electrical Fields in Glioblastoma.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38396172/
Great info DCGreenZone
Thank you for confirming my impressions. I had heard it was particularly poor as relates to information about persons and otherwise unreliable. O that basis I haven't sought it out .
Very helpful for navigating the Great Holocaust. Thank you.
I remember hearing Larry Sanger discuss the bias on a podcast on the last few years. He was a co-founder of Wikipedia. https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/feb/21/co-founder-says-wikipedias-neutrality-long-gone-ci/
The other Jimmy Wales was a futures trader so he is probably still all about money, money over facts and truth.
Thank God someone is writing about Wikipedia and the disservice it is doing. At least 7 or 8 years ago I started questioning what I was reading on the site because it just didn’t jibe with what I knew to be true. It became overwhelmingly clear in 2020 when many excellent doctors and others were publicly humiliated by the rewrite of their Wikipedia pages with no recourse. I now avoid it because I know it is biased and just another propaganda tool. Unfortunately, something that was a great idea was bastardized and is no longer relevant.
So right on.
Could you check on the Metabolic Theory link from Dr. Seyfreid? It takes me to Amazon for Dr. Marik’s book. Possibly because I am in Costa Rica?
Here is a great talk by Dr. Seyfried on the Metabolic Theory of Cancer.
https://youtu.be/06e-PwhmSq8?si=uXFHoAgx3nl5LBJH
You don't have to look much further than to know that the founder of Wikipedia is a huge donor to Joe "Potatoe Head Pedo" Bidens campaign! Always follow the money!
When Wikipedia was relatively new, I listened to a lecture about how it was a site, par excellence, by the founder. I actually spoke to him, as from a librarian point of view, we wanted students to not use Wikipedia. This person, high up in Wikipedia, said that doctors use Wikipedia all of the time as their main source of information about drugs and dosages and medical issues. I asked my young nephew, a doctor about this, and he agreed. I don’t think this is the case now, as there are more official databases for this, but I thought that it was pretty scary that people were being medically treated according to Wikipedia protocols.
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past” ……………..
Thank you for the good article. It was sometime around the 2016 election year I became aware the Wikipedia is most definitely NOT reliable when it comes political subjects. Add to that things that shouldn't be political but get politicized, like the topics in your article.
I still use Wikipedia for non controversial interests, like cars and music. I find it pretty reliable for those. I am somewhat torn because it is a useful resource for many things and there is no alternative I know of nearly as voluminous. So I just steer clear of anything controversial.
The three letter agencies can't help shooting themselves in the foot.
Wikipedia, in spite of their best efforts to make it a propaganda organ to serve their interests, is still valuable.
The reason for that is because they can only tell lies about things around the edges. The truth is indisputable, as, like they say, a lion.
Take for example their page on Eugene Debs,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Debs
Is that going to help them enslave the world?