How Dangerous is 5G? - Extremely - & How to Protect Yourself:
Take the Two Polls
Since I first wrote about Microwave Energy, others like Dr. Tess Lawrie and Dr. Lee Vliet have sounded the alarm. And prolonged exposure to even 3G and 4G is linked with Glioblastoma - the same type of brain cancer my friend got. It is also caused Attorney Jimmy Gonzales’ brain cancer and death - but not before he alerted the public to this problem - the dangers of Cell Phone Transmission - through his testimony.
Keep in mind that Jimmy was never exposed to 5G. Older 3G and 4G cell phone transmitters only exposed human beings to 9,000 microWatts but switching to 5G technology led to an increase in radiation from 9,000 microWatts / m2 to a maximum of 1,690,000 microWatts / m2 - a factor of nearly 187.
If it took Attorney Gonzales 10 years of continuous cell phone use to contract his fatal brain cancer with 9,000 microWatts, how long do you think it would take if during every cell phone call, he was exposed to over 1.6 million microWatts? 187 times faster than 10 years comes out to only 19 days to get the equivalent exposure [10 x 365 = 3650 and 3650/187 = 19.5].
Attorney Callender and Dr. Lee Vliet have already warned that they believe this will cause the lipid nanoparticles to swell and release their contents which may include sequences to the Marburg virus. Please see my recent article for Repurposed Drugs for Marburg.
In an interview a few days ago, Callender comments on a FEMA Whistleblower video statement warning of the upcoming FEMA emergency test. I believe it would be prudent to take precautions, specifically to protect yourself against 5G during the test, and in general to shield yourself and family from 5G transmissions. Please familiarize yourself with the health dangers in the following link based upon an Oncologist’s study.
I recommend shielding yourself with garments that block 5G EMF and they can be purchased from various suppliers on Amazon - hoodies, ponchos, blankets, etc.
And turn off your devices October 4th during the test for the entire 2 hours - there is a possible back up test scheduled October 11th. Protect yourself on both dates. Please watch the Callender video for the specifics. This story is free to all, and I invite comments. I also include two polls to sample how widely citizens are aware of the massive health risks of 5G.
I have measured many 4G cell phones (not 5G) and pretty much all of them "max out" the RF readings on any EMF meter just when making a call or using data. So the best I can do so far is to find a "best of the bad lot" 4G phone, always keep data turned off by default except when actually using data, and put it on speakerphone when making calls (or use headphones if possible). The best readings I have seen are when the 700/600 MHz bands go into use on a phone (I have found that the phone needs to support both Bands 71 and 12, not just 12 alone, for this to work)- not only do these bands usually give exponentially lower RF readings on a meter, but they are also much lower frequency than the 1700-2500 MHz range that is typically used for 4G LTE as well as WiFi. BUT just because a phone has Bands 71 and 12 doesn't mean it will actually use them- I have found very few phones that actually use those bands frequently, even among the hard-to-find phones that do support both bands. So in summary, it's tough enough to minimize RF exposure even without 5G.
Regarding 2nd poll.... I do all of the options and don't allow visitors to bring cell phones into the house; they have to leave them behind and turned off. I moved from a place within a 1/4 mile of a cell tower - which killed off my beehives to a place where there is next to no cell signal at all.
I go slowly frantic when I'm in a crowded public place, a fair or some such, where there is lots of signal. It's interesting to watch the behavior of the birds at such a time; they go nuts too.
Is the Oct 4 test real or an urban legend?